1) Is VLAN3 in STP forwarding state on Gi0/1, Gi0/2, and wherever the root port is? 2) Is VLAN3 defined on the device on the other end of Portchannel1?
Ken Matlock Network Engineer 303-467-4671 [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Berry [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 11:41 AM To: 'Peter Rathlev'; Andrew Miehs; Matlock, Kenneth L Cc: 'cisco-nsp' Subject: RE: [c-nsp] FW: Cisco blade switch config Corrected this. Now gi 0/1 - 3 show up/up. My uplinks, gi 0/20 & 0/22 are also up/up. I can now ping the root switch from this switch on VLAN 1 (10.10.0.x) and VLAN 2 (192.168.1.x), but NOT VLAN 3 (172.18.132.x). This occurs over an etherchannel link that includes these 3 vlans. This is the case for both of my Cisco switches in this enclosure (redundant) talking back to my HP root. Checked the HP. The trunks are tagged for all of those vlans. From the HP, I can ping out to servers on all of those vlans without a hitch. -----Original Message----- From: Peter Rathlev [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 12:59 PM To: Kevin Berry Cc: cisco-nsp Subject: Re: [c-nsp] FW: Cisco blade switch config On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 09:25 -0500, Kevin Berry wrote: > Now, the show inter trunk: ... > WHY is it that gi 0/1 & gi 0/2 are not here? I have hosts in those > slots, powered on, and need to be on VLANs 1,2,3, 100. Maybe they're down. The "operational mode" of "show interface Gi0/{1,2} switchport" should tell you what the port is like. -- Peter _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
