hehe...thanks for the reply, but this post was sent back in 2011...for some reason, a few "older" posts seemed to have arrived today. And agree 100% - We replaced a 2960G with a 4948, and no longer see any drops.
From: [email protected] To: [email protected]; [email protected] Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 13:37:48 -0700 Subject: RE: [c-nsp] FW: 2960S drops/packet loss The 2960 has very small buffers.The end solution is a better box since these are queue drops.Replacing the 2960 with a 4948 will solve your problem (although it costs money).Another solution is making sure that most packets are being received on links withthe same speed as they are going out so no buffering takes place.Ie. Use all 1G links. LR Mack McBrideNetwork Architect From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Elliot Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 4:33 PM To: cisco-nsp Subject: [c-nsp] FW: 2960S drops/packet loss Re-forward - My original reply seems to have gone missing... Thanks - Fairly certain we are seeing actual drops (And we are seeing packet-loss across this link) Gi1/0/17 is mapped to asic 0/20 Gi1/0/17 17 17 17 0/20 1 17 17 local Yes Yes Port-asic Port Drop Statistics - Summary ======================================== Port 20 TxQueue Drop Stats: 308277833 And majority appear to be in Queue 1: (The formatting will probably be screwed up by Hotmail.... apologies) Port 20 TxQueue Drop Statistics Queue 0 Weight 0 Frames 3 Weight 1 Frames 0 Weight 2 Frames 0 Queue 1 Weight 0 Frames 308240408 Weight 1 Frames 458 Weight 2 Frames 0 Queue 2 Weight 0 Frames 37898 Weight 1 Frames 0 Weight 2 Frames 0 Queue 3 Weight 0 Frames 91 Weight 1 Frames 0 Weight 2 Frames 0 Queue 4 Weight 0 Frames 0 Weight 1 Frames 0 Weight 2 Frames 0 Queue 5 Weight 0 Frames 0 Weight 1 Frames 0 Weight 2 Frames 0 Queue 6 Weight 0 Frames 0 Weight 1 Frames 0 Weight 2 Frames 0 Queue 7 Weight 0 Frames 0 Weight 1 Frames 0 Weight 2 Frames 0 So hoping someone can suggest a few tweaks to reduce these drops(And also (more importantly!) the packet-loss) Note - We have other ports on this switch doing far more traffic, but not seeing any loss/drops on these....so I believe it is due to the bursty traffic specific to this trunk port Cheers From: [email protected] To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:08:17 -0500 Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 2960S drops/packet lossWe’ve run into the same/similar output drop bug (technically a “different” bug, with ID CSCtq86186, but it’s really the same thing). We’re seeing it on a 3750X with 12.2(58)SE. TAC also recommended that we upgrade to 15.2 to fix the issue, but as Andriy noted, it hasn’t been released yet. When I asked them about this, they said that it was actually fixed in 15.0.1(SE1), which was released Dec 2nd. We haven’t tested that assertion out yet; we’ve decided to hold off on putting the “fresh out of the oven” IOS on our gear, but if someone else has, and has a good or bad experience we’d be all ears. And just to reiterate what Andriy said, use command ”sh platform port-asic stats drop” to get the true numbers as “sh int <blah>” can’t be trusted. Ensure there are actually drops happening, so you don’t end up chasing a ghost :) -Tom Tom Lusty Senior Systems Engineer Wayfair 177 Huntington Ave, Suite 6000 Boston, MA 02115 P: 617.502.7026 [email protected] -----Original Message----- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 13:09:24 +0100From: Andriy Bilous <[email protected]>To: John Elliot <[email protected]>Cc: cisco-nsp <[email protected]>Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 2960S drops/packet lossMessage-ID: <caonsrb9lo8yffjjwhopw09skk+gpkqjwwbk-ufzvtxaivph...@mail.gmail.com>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 There is a bug in most of SEs for all stackable models, which makes drop statistics unusable (see CSCso81660 for example - there are lots of BugIDs with same diagnostics and keep in mind "Fixed-in is a lie).Reported numbers aren't realistic and often go both ways - increase and decrease in what appears to be a random manner. sh platform port-asic stats drop should report right value though. So, before you start tweaking, you may want to look further into it and just wait for the sane IOS release. Our SE reported it's fixed in 15.2, which isn't available for download yet. On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:41 AM, John Elliot <[email protected]> wrote:> > Hi Guys,> > Have a pair of 2960's in a stack, one port(trunk) connects to another DC and we are seeing ~5% packet-lossand large output drops to this DC.> > > #sh interfaces gigabitEthernet 1/0/17 counters errors> > Port ? ? ? ?Align-Err ? ? FCS-Err ? ?Xmit-Err ? ? Rcv-Err ?UnderSize > ?OutDiscards> Gi1/0/17 ? ? ? ? ? ?0 ? ? ? ? ? 0 ? ? ? ? ? 0 ? ? ? ? ? 0 ? ? ? ? ?0 ? > ? ? 182867> > GigabitEthernet1/0/17 is up, line protocol is up (connected) ?Hardware > is Gigabit Ethernet, address is a0cf.5b87.ec11 (bia a0cf.5b87.ec11) > ?Description: QinQ_to_DC2 ?MTU 1998 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100 > usec, ? ? reliability 255/255, txload 41/255, rxload 23/255 > ?Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set ?Keepalive set (10 sec) > ?Full-duplex, 100Mb/s, media type is 10/100/1000BaseTX ?input > flow-control is off, output flow-control is unsupported ?ARP type: > ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00 ?Last input 6d13h, output 00:00:00, output > hang never ?Last clearing of "show interface" counters 04:02:15 ?Input > queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 183592 > ?Queueing strategy: fifo ?Output queue: 0/40 (size/max) ?30 second > input rate 9047000 bits/sec, 2075 packets/sec ?30 second output rate > 16324000 bits/sec, 2309 packets/sec> > > As you can see, 30sec rate isnt excessive, but as the drops are outdiscards it would appear we are getting hit by the small buffers/microburst issue.> > Done a bit of reasearch, and as we have mls qos configured(Need to as we have to trust dscp markings), we needto look at "tweaking" the buffer allocations on the switch to hopefully mitigate these drops.> > There appears to be a range of recommendations when it comes to these tweaks - Hoping someone has some suggestions on what to set with "mls qos queue-set output" to alleviate the drops?(start conservative, then apply more aggressive if needed)....and also, does adjusting the buffers require an outage window?> > Our traffic is primarily backup(replication which is very bursty), and > Internet> > Thanks in advance.> _______________________________________________> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ------------------------------ _______________________________________________cisco-nsp mailing [email protected]https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
<<inline: image001.gif>>
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
