And I assume no BPDUs are passed either. Is it possible to issue cmd: "l2protocol peer" or all the l2protocol commands are rejected altogether? Just to see if the L2protocol status changes somehow.
adam -----Original Message----- From: Chris Russell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 10:34 AM To: Adam Vitkovsky Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: [c-nsp] VPLS ASR1k - ME3800 - no L2 tunnelling ? On 21/08/2013 09:29, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: > Would you please try to remove the "encapsulation untagged" from the > efp 100 on ASR whether it makes any difference? Hi Adam No difference: DC#show ethernet service instance id 100 interface gig0/0/7 detail Service Instance ID: 100 Service Instance Type: static Associated Interface: GigabitEthernet0/0/7 Associated EVC: L2protocol drop CE-Vlans: Encapsulation: dot1q 1-4094 vlan protocol type 0x8100 Interface Dot1q Tunnel Ethertype: 0x8100 State: Up Thanks Chris _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
