Chris Welti <[email protected]> wrote:
>ingress and egress on the same interface is a configuration officially >supported by Cisco for the Sup2T. Escpecially for the Sup2T-XL/DFC4-XL >which has separate netflow tables for ingress and egress, there should >be no overflow issues due to this. I've not read anywhere or been told that ingress & egress is now officially supported on Sup2T, & would be grateful for any pointers you can share, thanks! >just as a side note, while 'match' is fine for input ifindex, output >ifindex should NOT be used as a match field in a netflow record for >ingress netflow. Concur 100%. The key ifindex should match the flow tabulation directionality. --------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
