EVC MIB should not require MPLS license. Have you opened a TAC case? Best Regards,
[http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group (SPAG) [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1 408 835 1389 CCIE - 19901 <http://www.cisco.com/> This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to:http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html From: Per Carlson <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Friday, December 13, 2013 6:10 AM Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x and ciscoEvcMIB Waking up an old thread again. I just tried walking another ME3600X which did have this MIB. The only difference between the two switches are the license level. The one working has got "AdvancedMetroIPAccess", and the other one (not working) has only got "MetroIPAccess". Why on earth would you need the Advanced license to use this MIB? EVCs are supported and working fine on the lesser license. Additionally with Advanced you can turn on "snmp-server enable traps evc", but not on Metro. I really hope this is a bug and not a feature... -- Pelle "D’ä e å, vett ja”, skrek ja, för ja ble rasen, ”å i åa ä e ö, hörer han lite, d’ä e å, å i åa ä e ö" - Gustav Fröding, 1895 On 15 October 2013 13:28, Nick Hilliard <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On 15/10/2013 14:24, Per Carlson wrote: Nope, a numerical OID doesn't help at all (I did try that before posting). pelle@kanelbulle:~$ snmpget rabbit .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.613 CISCO-EVC-MIB::ciscoEvcMIB = No Such Object available on this agent at this OID pelle@kanelbulle:~$ Weird - that oid should be populated. I'd open up a tac case if I were you. Nick _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
