On 4 July 2014 01:14, CiscoNSP List <[email protected]> wrote: > The carriers AGG port has multiple other customers(vlans), > and is only a 3560 (So minimal QOS capabilities)....Would something like an > ME3600 provide additional flexibility to shape at the vlan level egress? > i.e. Carrier AGG moved to an ME3600, shaping > policy that matches the two vlans, but I need the 2 vlans to "share" > the 50M shaping policy?
I'm a bit confused on the topology at your PE device; Do you only have one port facing the tail provider NNI and the two tail circuits have different VLANs on them such as the link to site 1 has VLAN 10 and 20 and the link to site 2 has VLAN 30 an 40? Or do these tails come in to two differnt interfaces? Or (hopefully not) do they both come into the same interface and have the same VLANs? Depending on which of the above you have you can acheive this with an ME3600/3800 using EVCs. Cheers, James. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
