Hello, Any chance you could post a small picture of your topology?
Regards On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 11:29 AM, James Bensley <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4 July 2014 01:14, CiscoNSP List <[email protected]> wrote: > > The carriers AGG port has multiple other customers(vlans), > > and is only a 3560 (So minimal QOS capabilities)....Would something like > an > > ME3600 provide additional flexibility to shape at the vlan level egress? > i.e. Carrier AGG moved to an ME3600, shaping > > policy that matches the two vlans, but I need the 2 vlans to "share" > > the 50M shaping policy? > > I'm a bit confused on the topology at your PE device; > > Do you only have one port facing the tail provider NNI and the two > tail circuits have different VLANs on them such as the link to site 1 > has VLAN 10 and 20 and the link to site 2 has VLAN 30 an 40? > > Or do these tails come in to two differnt interfaces? > > Or (hopefully not) do they both come into the same interface and have > the same VLANs? > > Depending on which of the above you have you can acheive this with an > ME3600/3800 using EVCs. > > Cheers, > James. > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
