JC Cockburn wrote: > Hi All, > Might be a dumb response, but what about REP? > > http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3560/software/rele > ase/15-0_2_se/configuration/guide/scg3560/swrep.html > > seems legit???
Isn't it for ring topologies? I have a "train" topology with some redundant links between neighboring switches. I have also considered FlexLinks but came to the conclusion that STP was safer. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:[email protected] _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
