Hi, thanks to both of you for the feedback. As we are a "typical" enterprise environment, TE isn't much of a concern for us.
Best Christopher -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Dienstag, 5. August 2014 20:25 To: [email protected] Cc: Christopher Werny; [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OSPFv3 Multiple Address Families Support in IOS > No TE extensions for OSPFv3 is the biggest issue. >>And for those who aren't married to OSPF, IS-IS is still an excellent >>alternative. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [email protected] > > Thanks > Darren > http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie > > > > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:48:22 +0000 > > Subject: [c-nsp] OSPFv3 Multiple Address Families Support in IOS > > > > Dear list, > > > > I noticed that support for multiple address families in OSPFv3 was added in > > recent IOS versions. I am currently thinking about updating the IOS > > version on my routers and subsequently consolidating OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 into > > OSPFv3 for both IPv4 and IPv6. > > > > Has anyone done this before and can share some experience with it? What are > > (in your opinion) the pros and cons of the aforementioned consolidation of > > OSPFv2/v3 into only OSPFv3? > > > > Thanks in advance for your time and feedback. > > > > Best, > > Christopher > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
