On Tuesday, August 05, 2014 07:48:22 PM Christopher Werny wrote: > I noticed that support for multiple address families in > OSPFv3 was added in recent IOS versions. I am currently > thinking about updating the IOS version on my routers > and subsequently consolidating OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 into > OSPFv3 for both IPv4 and IPv6. > > Has anyone done this before and can share some experience > with it? What are (in your opinion) the pros and cons of > the aforementioned consolidation of OSPFv2/v3 into only > OSPFv3?
The thing to remember is that even if you're using OSPFv3 to carry IPv4 NLRI, you still need an IPv6 link layer. I first saw this capability in OSPFv3 back in the early days of Junos 9. But we ran IS-IS then so the temptation was shortlived :-). Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
