Good to hear. Thanks for that Sent from my iPhone
> On 5 Aug 2014, at 19:45, "Christopher Werny" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Darren, > > Cisco implemented finally the OSPFv3 Authentication Trailer (RFC 7166) > beginning with 15.4S/T/M. I was able to configure it without a problem on a > 2921 running 15.4(3)M with ipbase license in our lab. > > Best, > Christopher > > -----Original Message----- > From: Darren O'Connor [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Dienstag, 5. August 2014 20:40 > To: Christopher Werny > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OSPFv3 Multiple Address Families Support in IOS > > There was an issue, at least a year or two ago, when it came to > authentication on ospfv3. > > Ospfv3 doesn't have built in authentication, rather it relies on ipv6 IPSec. > That's all fine and good until you realise you need the security license on > ios in order to use IPSec. So you cannot authenticate your peers with v3 out > the box on unlicensed ios. > > I would need to check if this has changed though > > > >> On 5 Aug 2014, at 19:29, "Christopher Werny" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> thanks to both of you for the feedback. As we are a "typical" enterprise >> environment, TE isn't much of a concern for us. >> >> Best >> Christopher >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Dienstag, 5. August 2014 20:25 >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: Christopher Werny; [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OSPFv3 Multiple Address Families Support in IOS >> >>> No TE extensions for OSPFv3 is the biggest issue. >> >>>> And for those who aren't married to OSPF, IS-IS is still an excellent >>>> alternative. >> >> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [email protected] >> >>> >>> Thanks >>> Darren >>> http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie >>> >>> >>> >>>> From: [email protected] >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:48:22 +0000 >>>> Subject: [c-nsp] OSPFv3 Multiple Address Families Support in IOS >>>> >>>> Dear list, >>>> >>>> I noticed that support for multiple address families in OSPFv3 was added >>>> in recent IOS versions. I am currently thinking about updating the IOS >>>> version on my routers and subsequently consolidating OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 >>>> into OSPFv3 for both IPv4 and IPv6. >>>> >>>> Has anyone done this before and can share some experience with it? What >>>> are (in your opinion) the pros and cons of the aforementioned >>>> consolidation of OSPFv2/v3 into only OSPFv3? >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance for your time and feedback. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Christopher >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >>> _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
