I get the 3bxl has its limitations. I can live with the cpu and i dont need full bgp necessarily. But what i dont get is the current memory consumption.
I filtered all the transits to only a default route. But still the memory stays at 90% full. I dont have soft-reconfig configured. Why is #sh ip bgp sum: BGP using 64542178 total bytes of memory But #sh proc mem sorted PID TTY Allocated Freed Holding Getbufs Retbufs Process 496 0 873738484 270014880 507419984 0 0 BGP Router And thus the eating all the memory. On a old 3800 we had basically the same config, bgp used around 300mb and total memory use was around 400mb. I dont see why the total memory consumption is 900mb and bgp only 300 (now 64 btw). i have no full table any more but the memory use hasnt droped. some must be wrong with me or my router. Thanks, Erik ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: "Mark Tinka" <[email protected]> Aan: "Chuck Church" <[email protected]>, [email protected] Verzonden: Woensdag 11 maart 2015 20:57:47 Onderwerp: Re: [c-nsp] BGP dram confusion On 11/Mar/15 21:55, Chuck Church wrote: > And since when isn't a 3BXL large enough for a full > table assuming you can live with the CPU issues. You said it :-)... Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
