On 24/Mar/15 10:37, Mattias Gyllenvarg wrote:
I have no machine in production yet so this is speculation.
But the ASR920 has less bufferspace then the ME3600x, this may be
handled by design if you utilize the extra Te interfaces in a clever
way. Thought it makes it hard to make a case for the ASR920 to replace
the ME3800x, Unless cisco invents a license for more bufferspace.
I think that the ME3800X will be sneaking into the ASR9000 realm.
The ASR920 only replaces the ME3600X, as they are of reasonably similar
scale.
The ME3800X still scales better than the ASR920, so it's not being
replaced by this unit for the time being.
Mark.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
