On Fri Dec 02, 2016 at 03:40:03PM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote: > Good to know. > > We are currently considering the 9508 for a particular role (Layer 2 > only), and I know they are based on the Broadcom chip. I'm guessing this > is where the limitation is coming from, yes?
The 92160 is based on Cisco silicon (ASE3, I think). So they can't even blame Broadcom :) Simon _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
