Jerry, thanks for reply! The example I gave was simplified. In short, unfortunately in this case it is not possible to configure those /31 networks to separate sub-interfaces.
Martin On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Jerry Bacon <[email protected]> wrote: > Just put each ISP on their own sub-interface. > > (Not sure why in the world you would have two different, unrelated > connections on the same sub-interface.) > > -- > > Jerry Bacon > Senior Network Engineer > StarTouch, Inc. > http://www.startouch.com > 360-543-5679 ext. 111 > Microwave - Fiber Optics - Internet Services > > On 3/6/2017 7:42 AM, Martin T wrote: >> >> I have a Cisco ISR G2 router with following sub-interface configuration: >> >> ! >> interface GigabitEthernet0/0.123 >> encapsulation dot1Q 123 >> ip address 10.10.10.58 255.255.255.254 secondary >> ip address 192.168.1.42 255.255.255.254 >> end >> >> 10.10.10.58/31 is connection to ISP-1 and 192.168.1.42/31 is >> connection to ISP-2. I need to count the bandwidth over SNMP for both >> connections separately. My first thought was to configure an ACL for >> traffic accounting purposes, but looks like ISR routers are not able >> to return ACL statistics over SNMP. >> >> Is it possible to monitor primary and secondary IP address traffic >> separately over SNMP? >> > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
