BLFs don't generate missed call alerts. only DNs. It might be helpful to get a third phone (or IP Communicator) so you don't have to 'dial itself', that might be making things a little confusing to understand the various behaviors.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Jeffrey Girard <[email protected] > wrote: > Nate – > > Thanks for the reply. > > > > Yes, see below > > > > . Finally, I set the Enterprise Parameter “BLF for Call > Lists” to enabled. > > > > > > *From:* NateCCIE [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 1, 2015 8:29 PM > *To:* Jeffrey Girard; [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [cisco-voip] CUCM Native Presence (BLF/SD) populating > Directories / Call Lists > > > > Do you have the enterprise parameter “BLF for call lists” enabled? > > > > *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Jeffrey Girard > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 01, 2015 6:20 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [cisco-voip] CUCM Native Presence (BLF/SD) populating > Directories / Call Lists > > > > All – > > I have been lurking on this list for quite a while as I > continue to hone my collaboration skills. > > > > CAVEAT: This is not a production system and is not for > any customer. This is my lab as I continue to try to learn. > > > > CUCM v9 > > > > Desired endstate: Populate the Missed Calls with CUCM Native Presence / > Speed Dial information. > > > > What I have configured: > > > > 2 phones, both 7962s. Both have a BLF/SD pointing to the > other. One DN is 3001 and the other DN is 3002. BLF/SDs work fine. > Created a single partition that holds all the phones PT_Internal and a > single CSS that holds the partition CSS_Internal. On each of the 7962s, I > set the line SUBSCRIBE CSS to CSS_Internal. Finally, I set the Enterprise > Parameter “BLF for Call Lists” to enabled. > > > > However, if I go offhook on 3002 and dial itself, I see > the BLF light on 3001. If I don’t answer the call and then I check the > missed calls for 3001, I expect to see an entry for 3002. However, nothing > shows. If I go offhook on 3002, call 3001, let it ring and do not answer, > that missed call shows up as it should. > > > > My Directories are populated with information from when I > park calls, directed parks, but not the missed call tied to the BLF. > > > > Is this the expected behavior? Am I expecting to see > something (this missed call from 3002) that should not be there by design? > > > > Thanks, > > Jeff > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > >
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
