But seriously, a premium license to administer the system? Does this include the appadministrator account too? Do you have first hand experience with it?
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 4:16 PM Pawlowski, Adam <aj...@buffalo.edu> wrote: > This was the information I heard as well, and the purchase quantities are > based on feature utilization and concurrency. > > > > > > > > *From:* cisco-voip <cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net> *On Behalf Of *Brian > Meade > *Sent:* Monday, May 11, 2020 5:07 PM > *To:* Anthony Holloway <avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> > *Cc:* Cisco VoIP Group <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> > *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX Flex Licensing > > > > Pretty sure when buying as A-Flex-CC that it always just gives you Premium > licensing on the CCX side. Had this cause an issue with a customer that > was staying on Enhanced for the extra CTI ports for many years. > > > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 4:23 PM Anthony Holloway < > avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote: > > All, > > > > Anyone already deal with this themselves? I am reading/being told > something I cannot swallow as the truth, because it seems so ridiculous. > > > > I am being told that you need a Premium license to even login as a > Supervisor at all. Like, not for extra functionality (silent monitoring), > but just as a basic license requirement to even sign in. > > > > Also, I am being told a Premium license is required for Administrative > users too. Like, even the app admin account. So what, completing a fresh > install now requires a Premium license? > > > > Are either of these true? Can you confirm from your own tests that this > is in fact how Flex works in UCCX on-prem? > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > >
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
