This is correct , especially true if you want to avoid
ebgp multihop statement in BGP you will use a static
route to interface which treats it as though it is
directly connected
hope this helps
suaveguru
--- John Neiberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, I believe that a static route pointing to
> a next hop has an AD of
> 1, but a static route pointing to an interface shows
> as directly connected
> and has an AD of 0.
>
> I just tested this to be sure, but someone else
> might want to verify it.
>
> John
>
> > >
> > > A directly connected network has an AD=0.
> > > A static route via Interface has AD=0
> > > A static route via IP address has AD=1
> Correct?
> >
> > A static route via interface cannot have AD of 0.
> > It can have AD from 1 (default) to 255, just like
> > any other static route.
> >
> > Sasa
> >
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________________
> Send a cool gift with your E-Card
> http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________________________________________
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
