Just from a learning standpoint, I agree the lab and written should
coincide. Perhaps a desktop/legacy specialization might be in order.
But there's a finite amount that people can learn and demonstrate,
and frankly, I'd rather see somewhat more depth in IP, and also MPLS,
than having lots and lots of depth yet being somewhat superficial in
the things you need to know about really big networks. Perhaps my
design bias is showing.
I do wonder about X.25. There's an old Army saying that you never
need a pistol until you need one very, very much. I still believe
X.25 can be an extremely useful niche protocol.
>I agree you should know how to do that stuff but I think the written and the
>lab should coincide.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Darren Crawford"
>To:
>Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 12:04 PM
>Subject: Re: CCIE written is outdated. [7:5756]
>
>
>> Because as a CCIE you should know how to do this stuff. ;^)
>>
>> D.
>>
>> At 01:04 PM 05/24/2001 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >The following have been removed from the lab. Why haven't the been
>removed
>> >from the CCIE written?
>> >
>> >LAT, DECnet, Apollo, Banyan VINES, ISO CLNS, XNS, ATM LANE, and X.25.
>> >Effective February 1, 2001, Appletalk will also be removed from the lab
>exam
> > >content.
>
> > x$:0`0:$x,,,,x$:0`0:$x,,,,x$:0`0:$x,,,,x$:0`0:$x$:0`0:$x,,,,x
>>
>> Darren S. Crawford
>> Network Systems Consultant
>> Lucent Technologies - Sacramento
>>
>> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> page via email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> pager: 800-467-1467
>>
> > x$:0`0:$x,,,,x$:0`0:$x,,,,x$:0`0:$x,,,,x$:0`0:$x$:0`0:$x,,,,x
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5779&t=5756
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
