Mr.Bad Attitude,
I never said the lab was outdated. I have never used web based utilities to
configure routers. All I said was the written test was outdated. They need
to update it. I didn't say make it easier. I asked why they still test us on
outdated technologies. I would rather spend my time studying BGP then how to
read a RIF.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Louie Belt"
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 5:17 PM
Subject: RE: CCIE written is outdated. [7:5756]
> And a calculator can do math for you, but would you substitute your
> knowledge of math for a dependancy on a calculator? If all you want to
do
> is follow the suggestions of a sniffer, then do so. If you want to learn
> networking then invest the time to undertand what it is the sniffer is
> telling you. I assume from your comments you would also prefer to use the
> web based configuration utilities for switches and routers - that way you
> don't have to know the syntax. I guess the CCIE lab is outdated as well.
>
> Louie
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Brian
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 5:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: CCIE written is outdated. [7:5756]
>
>
> exactly, I was just talking about this with a study partner, and the
> obsession with bits in the header is really deep here, and the canonical
> inversion stuff makes my brain hurt. I would think most packet sniffers
> would do this for you.
>
> Brian "Sonic" Whalen
> Success = Preparation + Opportunity
>
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2001, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> > At 04:59 PM 5/24/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >But do I really need to know how to read a RIF? How often do you read a
> RIF?
> >
> > I don't think so. That's one of the silliest topics, in my opinion. If
you
> > had to read a RIF you would use a protocol analyzer that would decode it
> > for you.
> >
> > >I know some day you could run into a situation where you really need to
> know
> > >how to read a RIF or know how to configure Apollo, Banyan VINES or XNS.
I
> > >guess I am just frustrated with the trivial parts of this test.
> > >
> > >Does anyone else out there feel this way about this test?
> > >
> > >
> > >. ----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Howard C. Berkowitz"
> > >To:
> > >Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 1:49 PM
> > >Subject: Re: CCIE written is outdated. [7:5756]
> > >
> > >
> > > > Just from a learning standpoint, I agree the lab and written should
> > > > coincide. Perhaps a desktop/legacy specialization might be in
order.
> > > >
> > > > But there's a finite amount that people can learn and demonstrate,
> > > > and frankly, I'd rather see somewhat more depth in IP, and also
MPLS,
> > > > than having lots and lots of depth yet being somewhat superficial in
> > > > the things you need to know about really big networks. Perhaps my
> > > > design bias is showing.
> > > >
> > > > I do wonder about X.25. There's an old Army saying that you never
> > > > need a pistol until you need one very, very much. I still believe
> > > > X.25 can be an extremely useful niche protocol.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >I agree you should know how to do that stuff but I think the
written
> and
> > >the
> > > > >lab should coincide.
> > > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > > >From: "Darren Crawford"
> > > > >To:
> > > > >Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 12:04 PM
> > > > >Subject: Re: CCIE written is outdated. [7:5756]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >> Because as a CCIE you should know how to do this stuff. ;^)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> D.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> At 01:04 PM 05/24/2001 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > >> >The following have been removed from the lab. Why haven't the
> been
> > > > >removed
> > > > >> >from the CCIE written?
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >LAT, DECnet, Apollo, Banyan VINES, ISO CLNS, XNS, ATM LANE, and
> > X.25.
> > > > >> >Effective February 1, 2001, Appletalk will also be removed from
> the
> > >lab
> > > > >exam
> > > > > > >content.
> > > > >
> > > > > > x$:0`0:$x,,,,x$:0`0:$x,,,,x$:0`0:$x,,,,x$:0`0:$x$:0`0:$x,,,,x
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Darren S. Crawford
> > > > >> Network Systems Consultant
> > > > >> Lucent Technologies - Sacramento
> > > > >>
> > > > >> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >> page via email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >> pager: 800-467-1467
> > > > >>
> > > > > > x$:0`0:$x,,,,x$:0`0:$x,,,,x$:0`0:$x,,,,x$:0`0:$x$:0`0:$x,,,,x
> > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > ________________________
> >
> > Priscilla Oppenheimer
> > http://www.priscilla.com
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5853&t=5756
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
