I think it is indeed a violation of the NDA to discuss actual test 
questions. I suggest we ignore questions that appear to come from an actual 
test. If the poster doesn't say which practice test the question comes 
from, then don't answer it.

Also, for a question that can easily be answered by typing a few characters 
in exec mode, it would be best to teach the person how to get the answer 
rather than just give them the answer, especially since there are router 
simulators out there.

On a tangent, if the test really expects one to memorize what happens when 
you type a typo, that's pretty silly. Maybe it did come from a practice 
test. It seems too stupid to have come from an actual test!? ;-)

Priscilla

At 04:38 PM 8/28/01, Wright, Jeremy wrote:
>I'm not arguing, I just thought with the first statement "I had a test
>question" and asking for an answer would be a violation of the NDA by
>revealing what is on the test. I really don't care personally, but just
>chipping in my 2 cents.
>
>                 -----Original Message-----
>                 From:   James Willard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>                 Sent:   Tuesday, August 28, 2001 3:17 PM
>                 To:     Wright, Jeremy; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>                 Subject:        Re: ambiguous command [7:17568]
>
>                 That isn't a NDA issue. That's something you can easily
test
>on any
>                 router that runs IOS. A quick test of telneting to a router
>and typing
>                 "show i" results in the "ambiguous command" message
followed
>by the
>                 Router# prompt. There's your answer.
>
>                 James Willard
>                 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>                 "Wright, Jeremy" wrote:
>                 >
>                 > Can't answer- must respect NDA
>                 >
>                 >                 -----Original Message-----
>                 >                 From:   jo carol
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>                 >                 Sent:   Tuesday, August 28, 2001 3:08 PM
>                 >                 To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>                 >                 Subject:        ambiguous command
>[7:17568]
>                 >
>                 >                 Hi
>                 >                 I had a question on a test that said if
>after a command you
>                 > get
>                 >                  %ambiguous command will the router
return
>to the original
>                 > command or
>                 >                 just router#
>                 >                 Thanks
>                 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>                 --
>
>                                         -James Donavon Willard
>([EMAIL PROTECTED])
________________________

Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17595&t=17568
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to