I recognized it from a test (I'd rather not say which one- "even the
paranoid have enemies")
-----Original Message-----
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 7:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ambiguous command [7:17568]
I think it is indeed a violation of the NDA to discuss actual test
questions. I suggest we ignore questions that appear to come from an actual
test. If the poster doesn't say which practice test the question comes
from, then don't answer it.
Also, for a question that can easily be answered by typing a few characters
in exec mode, it would be best to teach the person how to get the answer
rather than just give them the answer, especially since there are router
simulators out there.
On a tangent, if the test really expects one to memorize what happens when
you type a typo, that's pretty silly. Maybe it did come from a practice
test. It seems too stupid to have come from an actual test!? ;-)
Priscilla
At 04:38 PM 8/28/01, Wright, Jeremy wrote:
>I'm not arguing, I just thought with the first statement "I had a test
>question" and asking for an answer would be a violation of the NDA by
>revealing what is on the test. I really don't care personally, but just
>chipping in my 2 cents.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Willard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 3:17 PM
> To: Wright, Jeremy; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ambiguous command [7:17568]
>
> That isn't a NDA issue. That's something you can easily
test
>on any
> router that runs IOS. A quick test of telneting to a router
>and typing
> "show i" results in the "ambiguous command" message
followed
>by the
> Router# prompt. There's your answer.
>
> James Willard
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> "Wright, Jeremy" wrote:
> >
> > Can't answer- must respect NDA
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jo carol
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 3:08 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: ambiguous command
>[7:17568]
> >
> > Hi
> > I had a question on a test that said if
>after a command you
> > get
> > %ambiguous command will the router
return
>to the original
> > command or
> > just router#
> > Thanks
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
>
> -James Donavon Willard
>([EMAIL PROTECTED])
________________________
Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17604&t=17568
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
