If someone replies to a question indicating they can't respond due to NDA,
it's more than likely that that person has it on good authority that the
question comes from an official Cisco exam. It's best if people didn't jump
to responding to such questions until the poster identifies the source of
the question.
In this particular example, two people posted messages indicating answering
would contravene NDA. Groupstudy has never been about providing a home for
braindumps - it's been about enhansing knowledge. "Jo Carol" needs to keep
questions OFF the list unless the source has been specified--and the rest of
us need to take the time to make sure we're not contributing to devaluing
the worth of our Certifications.
-- Leigh Anne
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
James Willard
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 2:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ambiguous command [7:17568]
That isn't a NDA issue. That's something you can easily test on any
router that runs IOS. A quick test of telneting to a router and typing
"show i" results in the "ambiguous command" message followed by the
Router# prompt. There's your answer.
James Willard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Wright, Jeremy" wrote:
>
> Can't answer- must respect NDA
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jo carol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 3:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: ambiguous command [7:17568]
>
> Hi
> I had a question on a test that said if after a command
you
> get
> %ambiguous command will the router return to the original
> command or
> just router#
> Thanks
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
-James Donavon Willard ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17578&t=17568
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
