Are you trunking on any other ports? You need to trunk between switches if you want routing amongst multiple VLANs to become redundant via the MSFCs...
----- Original Message ----- From: "Washington Rico" To: Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 12:10 AM Subject: Intervlan Connectivity is not working? [7:23744] > Cisco People I need you help... > > I would appreciate any help. I have a 6500Cat running Redundant Supervisor > engines and two MSFC installed one on each supervisor engine. > ***** > Mod Slot Ports Module-Type Model Sub Status > --- ---- ----- ------------------------- ------------------- --- -------- > 1 1 2 1000BaseX Supervisor WS-X6K-SUP2-2GE yes ok > 15 1 1 Multilayer Switch Feature WS-F6K-MSFC2 no ok > 2 2 2 1000BaseX Supervisor WS-X6K-SUP2-2GE yes standby > 16 2 1 Multilayer Switch Feature WS-F6K-MSFC2 no ok > 3 3 8 1000BaseX Ethernet WS-X6408A-GBIC no ok > 4 4 8 1000BaseX Ethernet WS-X6408A-GBIC no ok > 6 6 48 10/100BaseTX Ethernet WS-X6348-RJ-45 no ok > 7 7 48 10/100BaseTX Ethernet WS-X6348-RJ-45 no ok > 8 8 48 10/100BaseTX Ethernet WS-X6348-RJ-45 no ok > 9 9 48 10/100BaseTX Ethernet WS-X6348-RJ-45 no ok > ***** > > I created one vlan (Vlan 20) and I want to use HSRP across the MSFC so the > clients can have a steady Gateway. > > Default vlan 1 works fine, I can ping accross to the other MSFC. But > Vlan20 the one I created on the switch does give me connectivity accoss > MFSC. > MSFC#1 > interface Vlan20 > ip address 10.224.173.3 255.255.255.0 > no ip redirects > ip route-cache flow > standby priority 80 preempt > standby authentication XXXX > standby ip 10.224.173.1 > MSFC#2 > interface Vlan20 > mac-address 0012.3456.7891 > ip address 10.224.173.2 255.255.255.0 > no ip redirects > ip route-cache flow > standby priority 90 preempt > standby authentication XXXX > standby ip 10.224.173.1 > ******** > Test-6500-MSFC2#ping 10.224.173.1 > > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.224.173.1, timeout is 2 seconds: > ..... > Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) > Test-6500-MSFC2# > ------ > ****** > On the switch trunks shows this... > > Test-6500> (enable) show trunk > * - indicates vtp domain mismatch > Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native vlan > -------- ----------- ------------- ------------ ----------- > 15/1 nonegotiate isl trunking 1 > 16/1 nonegotiate isl trunking 1 > > Port Vlans allowed on trunk > -------- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > 15/1 1-1005,1025-4094 > 16/1 1-1005,1025-4094 > > Port Vlans allowed and active in management domain > -------- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > 15/1 1 (enable) > > ********** > Show Vlan > VLAN Name Status IfIndex Mod/Ports, Vlans > ---- -------------------------------- --------- ------- > ------------------------ > 1 default active 199 1/1-2 > 2/1-2 > 20 TEST-VLAN active 208 > 30 VLAN30 active 207 > 999 Dead-Vlan active 225 3/1-8 > 4/1-8 > 6/1-48 > 7/1-48 > 8/1-48 > 9/1-48 > 1002 fddi-default active 200 > 1003 token-ring-default active 203 > 1004 fddinet-default active 201 > 1005 trnet-default active 202 > *********************************************************************** > > Question 1.----- > Why isn't vlan 20 and 30 and 999 in the Management domain? (Above Show > trunk command) > Question 2.----- > Becuase Vlan 20 and 30 aren't in the Management domain, Is this the reason > why I am getting no Msfc connectivity for those Vlans.. > > > Sorry for the long letter, appreciate any info you have.. > > Regards, > Eric > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > $B$+$o$$$$(B & $B;H$($k%V%i%&%6$G!"%$%s%?! http://explorer.msn.co.jp/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=23782&t=23744 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
