IMHO, EIGRP is the better of the two. But it's also IMHO that one should never stray from the standards. If you know without a doubt that no matter what happens, you will stay a cisco shop, then eigrp offers more functionallity. Remember also cisco suggests 50 routers in one area, so proper planning needs to be done for your edge routers and core routers.
-Patrick Or you can say screw it and use static routes! : ) >>> "Mears, Rob" 12/12/01 03:54PM >>> Hi all, We are in the middle of building out a new ATM network for the Core and on the outside we are going to be running about 80 3640 or 2600. We are in a big debate about the routing protocol, we are currently EIGRP. I have collected lots of info off Cisco's Web site about the two but wanted to hear it from the Engineers in the trenches. What's your take on it? If it were you what would you run (EIGRP, OSPF) and why? Thanks Rob Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28970&t=28966 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
