"Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote: > >I hear that argument a lot, "if you never plan to use another > >vendor...". It's really quite specious as it's not at all difficult to > >cutover from routing EIGRP to OSPF or vis versa if the need arises. > > > > Not only are Cisco's multi protocol, they are multi routing protocol > >routers. To convert simply enable both protocols. Once they are both up > >and running get rid of routing protocol that fell from your favor, > >wallah, done. > > > > MHO Dave > > True, but unless you already have a legacy desktop routing protocol > base, how likely is it to need the Appletalk and Novell capabilities, > now that both those upper layer suites are native IP? >
I think you may have misunderstood my statement and I probably wasn't exactly clear but when I said "multi routing protocol routers" I meant multi IP routing protocols:) I think that addresses your statement. Dave David Madland CCIE# 2016 Senior Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29018&t=28966 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
