EIGRP- easy to implement, less CPU/memory intensive than OSPF but proprietary.
OSPF- Takes more thought, can be more CPU/memory intensive, standard. If you running a hub and spoke environment and don't mind proprietary protocol I would run EIGRP. Only allow default to the remotes. Real simple, works great. Dave "Mears, Rob" wrote: > > Hi all, > > We are in the middle of building out a new ATM network for the Core and on > the outside we are going to be running about 80 3640 or 2600. We are in a > big debate about the routing protocol, we are currently EIGRP. > > I have collected lots of info off Cisco's Web site about the two but wanted > to hear it from the Engineers in the trenches. > What's your take on it? If it were you what would you run (EIGRP, OSPF) and > why? > > Thanks > Rob -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28973&t=28966 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
