OK...I will try FRTS and I will let you know the results. ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:19 PM Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
> Well, unless I'm just suffering from Friday Afternoon Brain, the traffic > figures still look weird to me. > Can you look at the traffic figures from the other end of the PVC? If so, > what do they say? > > I guess if the txload/rxload figures are for a 5-minute exponential > average (which I believe they are) and the 5-minute input/output figures > are a normal average (which I'm not sure of), those figures could make > sense, but you'd have to have a pretty extreme traffic pattern (which I > suppose you could if you've been testing throughput). > > What happens if you use FRTS instead of GTS? > > JMcL > > > ----- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 18/01/2002 02:05 pm ----- > > > "Joseba Izaga" > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 18/01/2002 11:54 am > Please respond to "Joseba Izaga" > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: > Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > > s1.1 is not used. > > To the physical interface I connected a frame-relay radio-modem configured > as Star (multipoint). So s1.1 is just for mapping clinet units. > > s1.1 doesn4t have traffic at all. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > To: > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:39 PM > Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > > > Something's a bit odd here. > > >From your 'show int', BW is 256 Kbps, txload is 64/255 (i.e close > enough > > to 64 Kbps for a bandwidth of 256 Kbps), yet the 5-minute output rate is > > 235 Kbps. Are you sure your bandwidth is configured correctly? > > > > Your 'show int' is for the physical interface, so it will include > traffic > > for all sub-interfaces (actually, in my experience, even if you do a > 'show > > int' for the sub-interface, the txload and rxload figures will actually > be > > for the whole physical interface, which is a nuisance). According to > the > > config you gave earlier, you have three sub-interfaces on that physical > > interface, only two of which are traffic shaped. Is that where your > extra > > traffic is coming from? > > > > JMcL > > ----- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 18/01/2002 10:34 am ----- > > > > > > "Joseba Izaga" > > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 18/01/2002 09:02 am > > Please respond to "Joseba Izaga" > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > cc: > > Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "steve skinner" > > To: > > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:33 AM > > Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > > > steve, > > > > Remember that I have limited each sub-int to 64kbps using the command > > > > traffic-shape rate 64000 12000 24000 > > > > (as steven recommend) > > > > but if I see the Serial statistics, I see more traffic than it suppose > to > > be. It should be a 128kbps max. For that reason I said that it is not > > function. > > > > Router#show int s 1 > > Serial1 is up, line protocol is up > > Hardware is PowerQUICC Serial > > Description: WII > > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 256 Kbit, DLY 20000 usec, > > reliability 255/255, txload 64/255, rxload 2/255 > > Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, loopback not set > > Keepalive not set > > Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 20/0, interface > broadcasts > > 20 > > Last input 00:00:05, output 00:00:00, output hang never > > Last clearing of "show interface" counters 1w6d > > Queueing strategy: fifo > > Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops > > 5 minute input rate 43000 bits/sec, 6 packets/sec > > 5 minute output rate 235000 bits/sec, 7 packets/sec > > 3060238 packets input, 295363575 bytes, 0 no buffer > > Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles > > 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort > > 4012231 packets output, 4121859399 bytes, 0 underruns > > 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets > > 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out > > 0 carrier transitions > > DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up > > > > Joseba > > > > > hi.... > > > > > > it seems ok to me as there is packets on the "stats" command but, > > > > > > i need to ask this....sorry. > > > > > > you said before that it is not working ,but how do you know it`s not > > working > > > ???...i feel i am bieng a bit thick and missing something... > > > > > > cheers > > > > > > steve > > > > > > > > > >From: "Joseba Izaga" > > > >To: "steve skinner" , > > > >Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > > >Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 10:07:23 -0800 > > > > > > > >Steve, > > > > > > > >This is what I got > > > > > > > >Router#show traffic-shape statistics > > > > Access Queue Packets Bytes Packets > > > >Bytes Shaping > > > >I/F List Depth Delayed > > Delayed > > > >Active > > > >Se1.2 0 289 45537 0 > > > >0 no > > > >Se1.3 0 36573 5751328 114 > > > >63246 no > > > >Router# > > > > > > > >Also, > > > > > > > >Router#sh traffic-shape serial 1.2 > > > > Access Target Byte Sustain Excess > > > >Interval Increment Adapt > > > >I/F List Rate Limit bits/int bits/int > > > >(ms) (bytes) Active > > > >Se1.2 64000 2000 8000 8000 125 > > > >1000 - > > > > > > > >Router#sh traffic-shape serial 1.3 > > > > Access Target Byte Sustain Excess > > > >Interval Increment Adapt > > > >I/F List Rate Limit bits/int bits/int > > > >(ms) (bytes) Active > > > >Se1.3 32000 2000 8000 8000 250 > > > >1000 - > > > > > > > >So, what do you think? > > > > > > > >Joseba Izaga > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > >From: "steve skinner" > > > >To: > > > >Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:17 AM > > > >Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > > > > > > > > > > > > hi ... > > > > > > > > > > if you do a "show traffic-shape" what does the "byte limit" count > > say > > > >for > > > > > each VC.... > > > > > > > > > > also what does > > > > > > > > > > show traffic-shape stats ...say > > > > > > > > > > hth > > > > > > > > > > steve > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Joseba Izaga" > > > > > >Reply-To: "Joseba Izaga" > > > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > > > > >Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:08:16 -0500 > > > > > > > > > > > >This is the configuration I have in all 17204s. As you can see, I > > am > > > >using > > > > > >GTS, but is not working, it is not limiting to 64 or 32. > > > > > > > > > > > >interface Serial1 > > > > > > description WII-Enlace-Sebaco > > > > > > bandwidth 256 > > > > > > no ip address > > > > > > no ip directed-broadcast > > > > > > encapsulation frame-relay IETF > > > > > > no keepalive > > > > > > no fair-queue > > > > > >! > > > > > >interface Serial1.1 multipoint > > > > > > description MP-Sebaco > > > > > > ip address 132.1.21.1 255.255.255.0 > > > > > > no ip directed-broadcast > > > > > > no arp frame-relay > > > > > > frame-relay map ip 132.1.21.2 515 > > > > > > frame-relay map ip 132.1.21.3 519 > > > > > > frame-relay map ip 132.1.21.4 523 > > > > > >! > > > > > >interface Serial1.2 point-to-point > > > > > > bandwidth 64 > > > > > > ip unnumbered FastEthernet0 > > > > > > no ip directed-broadcast > > > > > > no arp frame-relay > > > > > > traffic-shape rate 64000 8000 8000 1000 > > > > > > no cdp enable > > > > > > frame-relay interface-dlci 516 > > > > > >! > > > > > >interface Serial1.3 point-to-point > > > > > > bandwidth 64 > > > > > > ip unnumbered FastEthernet0 > > > > > > no ip directed-broadcast > > > > > > no arp frame-relay > > > > > > traffic-shape rate 32000 8000 8000 1000 > > > > > > no cdp enable > > > > > > frame-relay interface-dlci 520 > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > >Joseba Izaga > > > > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > > > >From: "mike" > > > > > >To: "Joseba Izaga" ; > > > > > >Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 6:17 PM > > > > > >Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It should work using 12.0 on a 1720 router. We use 12.0.7T on > > our > > > > > >1720s, > > > > > > > and traffic shape using map-classes and priority queueing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What does your config look like, what commands are you using > to > > > >verify > > > > > > > traffic shaping is/isn't on? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > From: "Joseba Izaga" > > > > > > > To: > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:38 PM > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I already did a frame-relay traffic shaping and limit with > > CIR, > > > >but > > > > > >did > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > function. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What else can I do instead of upgrading the IOS? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > > From: "Steven A. Ridder" > > > > > > > > To: > > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:22 PM > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Try upgrading the IOS or do CBWFQ or frame-relay traffic > > shaping > > > >and > > > > > > > limit > > > > > > > > > with CIR. Create a map class and add map class to > > subinterface. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ""Joseba Izaga"" wrote in message > > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a 1720 with 2 WIC-1T. I have 2 frame-relay > > radiomodem > > > > > >connected > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > each > > > > > > > > > > port. Each port has 2 sub-interfaces. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What I need is to limit the bandwidth on the > sub-interface > > to > > > >64k. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now I am using the command traffic-rate shape > 64000 > > on > > a > > > > > >CISCO > > > > > > > > 2620 > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > it is working good, but not on the 1720. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The 1720 has 12.0 IOS version. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, why the 1720 is not limiting the bandwitdh? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Or, there is another way to limit the bandwitdh? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Joseba Izaga > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > > > >http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > > > http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32433&t=32072 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
