Steve,
This is what I got
Router#show traffic-shape statistics
Access Queue Packets Bytes Packets
Bytes Shaping
I/F List Depth Delayed Delayed
Active
Se1.2 0 289 45537 0
0 no
Se1.3 0 36573 5751328 114
63246 no
Router#
Also,
Router#sh traffic-shape serial 1.2
Access Target Byte Sustain Excess
Interval Increment Adapt
I/F List Rate Limit bits/int bits/int
(ms) (bytes) Active
Se1.2 64000 2000 8000 8000 125
1000 -
Router#sh traffic-shape serial 1.3
Access Target Byte Sustain Excess
Interval Increment Adapt
I/F List Rate Limit bits/int bits/int
(ms) (bytes) Active
Se1.3 32000 2000 8000 8000 250
1000 -
So, what do you think?
Joseba Izaga
----- Original Message -----
From: "steve skinner"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:17 AM
Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
> hi ...
>
> if you do a "show traffic-shape" what does the "byte limit" count say for
> each VC....
>
> also what does
>
> show traffic-shape stats ...say
>
> hth
>
> steve
>
>
> >From: "Joseba Izaga"
> >Reply-To: "Joseba Izaga"
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
> >Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:08:16 -0500
> >
> >This is the configuration I have in all 17204s. As you can see, I am
using
> >GTS, but is not working, it is not limiting to 64 or 32.
> >
> >interface Serial1
> > description WII-Enlace-Sebaco
> > bandwidth 256
> > no ip address
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > encapsulation frame-relay IETF
> > no keepalive
> > no fair-queue
> >!
> >interface Serial1.1 multipoint
> > description MP-Sebaco
> > ip address 132.1.21.1 255.255.255.0
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > no arp frame-relay
> > frame-relay map ip 132.1.21.2 515
> > frame-relay map ip 132.1.21.3 519
> > frame-relay map ip 132.1.21.4 523
> >!
> >interface Serial1.2 point-to-point
> > bandwidth 64
> > ip unnumbered FastEthernet0
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > no arp frame-relay
> > traffic-shape rate 64000 8000 8000 1000
> > no cdp enable
> > frame-relay interface-dlci 516
> >!
> >interface Serial1.3 point-to-point
> > bandwidth 64
> > ip unnumbered FastEthernet0
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > no arp frame-relay
> > traffic-shape rate 32000 8000 8000 1000
> > no cdp enable
> > frame-relay interface-dlci 520
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Joseba Izaga
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "mike"
> >To: "Joseba Izaga" ;
> >Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 6:17 PM
> >Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
> >
> >
> > > It should work using 12.0 on a 1720 router. We use 12.0.7T on our
> >1720s,
> > > and traffic shape using map-classes and priority queueing
> > >
> > > What does your config look like, what commands are you using to verify
> > > traffic shaping is/isn't on?
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Joseba Izaga"
> > > To:
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:38 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
> > >
> > >
> > > > I already did a frame-relay traffic shaping and limit with CIR, but
> >did
> > > not
> > > > function.
> > > >
> > > > What else can I do instead of upgrading the IOS?
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Steven A. Ridder"
> > > > To:
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:22 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Try upgrading the IOS or do CBWFQ or frame-relay traffic shaping
and
> > > limit
> > > > > with CIR. Create a map class and add map class to subinterface.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ""Joseba Izaga"" wrote in message
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have a 1720 with 2 WIC-1T. I have 2 frame-relay radiomodem
> >connected
> > > > to
> > > > > > each
> > > > > > port. Each port has 2 sub-interfaces.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What I need is to limit the bandwidth on the sub-interface to
64k.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Right now I am using the command traffic-rate shape 64000 on a
> >CISCO
> > > > 2620
> > > > > and
> > > > > > it is working good, but not on the 1720.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The 1720 has 12.0 IOS version.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So, why the 1720 is not limiting the bandwitdh?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Or, there is another way to limit the bandwitdh?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Joseba Izaga
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32173&t=32072
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
