Nice workaround but isn't that a very expensive bridge you just created? Perhaps selling the UBR and getting something cheaper would be a better solution?
""Cebuano"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, all. > This is just a short notice for people on this list that are subscribers of > Cox Communications and have been denied the use of the Cisco uBR924 or newer > models. > I have battled the company's politics in the past when i wanted to connect my > uBR924 to their network. I even escalated my request to their Tech. > Engineering Dept. in San Diego, only to be told that they no longer support > any Cisco cable modems in their database. > Alas, after a few months of being quarantined by the likes of Doyle, Halabi > and the gang, i was able to spare a few hours to configure my uBR for basic > bridging operation (config is on CCO) and call up their local tech support > and > lied that I wanted to register a Toshiba modem. Gave the tech the MAC and > Serial number (thank G~d she did not recognize these as Cisco numbers!!), and > in two minutes my unit was "provisioned". > I hope this message helps one or more list subscribers. > Albeit I still believe for most transactions that Honesty is the best policy > (hey, I was honest in my quest :-> ) > > > Elmer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40238&t=40208 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
