John, Basically you just set the UBR to factory default which is set to bridging mode. To do so, you can also erase your startup config which will cause it to be in bridging mode and DHCP client. But if you need the config, here it is...
uBR924#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 1045 bytes ! ! No configuration change since last restart ! version 12.1 no service pad service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime service password-encryption ! hostname uBR924 ! enable password 7 xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ! ! ! ! ! clock timezone - -5 ip subnet-zero no ip routing ! ip audit notify log ip audit po max-events 100 ! ! ! ! voice-port 0 input gain -2 output attenuation 0 ! voice-port 1 input gain -2 output attenuation 0 ! ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 ip address xxxxxxxxxxxxx no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache bridge-group 59 bridge-group 59 spanning-disabled ! interface cable-modem0 no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache cable-modem downstream saved channel xxxxxxx cable-modem mac-timer t2 40000 bridge-group 59 bridge-group 59 spanning-disabled ! ip default-gateway xxxxxxxx ip classless no ip http server ! snmp-server manager bridge 1 protocol ieee ! line con 0 exec-timeout 0 0 password 7 xxxxxxxxxxx logging synchronous login line vty 0 4 password 7 xxxxxxxxxxxx login ! end Notice that the default gateway and ehternet IP are dynamically assigned. Check that your voice ports are physically okay. Just plug in any analog phone and you should get a dial tone. You will get a "busy" tone once you press the dial pad until you configure and enable your voice ports. HTH, Elmer ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Huston" To: Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 7:03 PM Subject: Re: COX Cable and Cisco uBR924 owners [7:40208] > Would you be willing to share your configuration with me less the ip > addresses you us and also your passwords? I would greatly appreciate it. > > Regards, > > John Huston > > ""Cebuano"" wrote in message > news:... > > I spoke with one of Cisco's engineers in RTP and he said he did not have > any > > problem using this on Time Warner and with VoIP set up. > > As far as why I am using this instead of a cheaper modem, it's because I > > need to be able to call my brother out of state (who also has the same > unit) > > without worrying about long-distance fees. > > > > Elmer > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Tim Medley" > > To: > > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 6:00 PM > > Subject: RE: COX Cable and Cisco uBR924 owners [7:40208] > > > > > > > Good Job. Sometimes you have to bend the truth to get around the > > > politics. > > > > > > I've had a similar issue with TimeWarner Road Runner and my ubr924. They > > > won't support it in docsis mode and the basic bridging config doesn't > > > seem to work with their setup. > > > > > > For now I am using a 2611 that I bought for my lab. > > > > > > tm > > > > > > Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice, CCDP > > > Sr. Network Architect > > > VoIP Group > > > iReadyWorld > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > > > Cebuano > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 1:32 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: COX Cable and Cisco uBR924 owners [7:40208] > > > > > > Hi, all. > > > This is just a short notice for people on this list that are subscribers > > > of > > > Cox Communications and have been denied the use of the Cisco uBR924 or > > > newer > > > models. > > > I have battled the company's politics in the past when i wanted to > > > connect my > > > uBR924 to their network. I even escalated my request to their Tech. > > > Engineering Dept. in San Diego, only to be told that they no longer > > > support > > > any Cisco cable modems in their database. > > > Alas, after a few months of being quarantined by the likes of Doyle, > > > Halabi > > > and the gang, i was able to spare a few hours to configure my uBR for > > > basic > > > bridging operation (config is on CCO) and call up their local tech > > > support > > > and > > > lied that I wanted to register a Toshiba modem. Gave the tech the MAC > > > and > > > Serial number (thank G~d she did not recognize these as Cisco > > > numbers!!), and > > > in two minutes my unit was "provisioned". > > > I hope this message helps one or more list subscribers. > > > Albeit I still believe for most transactions that Honesty is the best > > > policy > > > (hey, I was honest in my quest :-> ) > > > > > > > > > Elmer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42187&t=40208 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
