Is it because skinny, like h.323 hasa the iP address in the l7 packet as well? I don't know why one can't nat, but I have yet to sniff a skinny paket.
STeve ""Tangled Up in Blue"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > actually, i retract that statement. i've only successfully used ip phones > with private ip's with gateways that have private ip's as well. i actually > tried setting up an external gatekeeper/gw with natted ip phones, using > conduit permits on the PIX for the RAS ports, etc. and actually had partial > success, but by definition, steven is right. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47772&t=47739 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
