The way I understand it, once a dynamic crypto map is "activated" (the
dynamic client connects), a route is added to its dynamic table of
reachable subnets.  The route to the remote lan is only active when the
dynamic vpn client establishes a connection and completes both phases of
tunnel setup.

This being said, no, you don't have to create a static route to the
remote lan on the central router.

The next question would then be: If running a Routing protocol such as
RIP or EIGRP, do you need to include those remote lan subnets in the AS
definition??

I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure this is correct. 

As I've never done this before, anybody, please feel free to correct me
:)

Mark 

--- jdr  wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm sorry for ask this stupid question, but I can't
> find a answer
> 
> 
> I'm working on this scenario:
> 
> LAN-to-LAN ipsec conections, hub and spoke topology.
> A central site with a 7100 router,10 remote sites
> with 806 routers (ADSL or
> cable connections).
> 
> 
> 1.1.1.0-- (7100 Router)- 11.1.1.1 -------  INTERNET 
> ---------- X.X.X.X
> (806 Router)-- 2.2.2.0
>                                                     
>                       |
>                                                     
>                       |
>                                                     
>                       -
> --------- Y.Y.Y.Y  (806 Router)-- 2.2.3.0
> 
> 
> My problem is that the 806 public IPs are dynamic
> and it can change every
> time that the 806 router restart.
> 
> If the remote site IPs are dynamic, how do I can
> route the traffic from the
> central site to the branch ofices?
> 
> I can configure the central router to accept dynamic
> connections with a
> preshared Key (for example), but Idon't know
> configure the central site to
> reach the private LANs of the remotes sites after
> the connections are up.
> 
> The CISCO examples always use a route to the remote
> LAN through the public
> IP (X.X.X.X) of the remote sites, but I can't use it
> on this scenario
> because it could change .
> 
> 
> Thank you for your help and your patience (as I tell
> you it was a stupid
> question).
> 
> 
> 
> Juan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__________________________________________________
Yahoo! - We Remember
9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost
http://dir.remember.yahoo.com/tribute




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53054&t=53028
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to