All, See: http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,612.0.html
The commenters seem to be virtually unanimous: the tags in the form [[Category: XYZ Workgroup (Top)]] have outlived their usefulness. Therefore, I'd like to ask anyone who cares to do two things: (1) Please go through all the articles in those categories. An exhaustive list can be found here: http://pilot.citizendium.org/wiki/Citizendium_Pilot:Discipline_Workgroups If there are any articles that are marked as in that category, but they are *not* also in [[Category:XYZ Workgroup]], please *do* add the latter tag. In this case, you could simply delete the string ' (Top)' and you'd be finished. Of course, if an article is in both [[Category: XYZ Workgroup (Top)]] [[Category: XYZ Workgroup]] then delete the first but not the second. (2) Please edit the templates for the workgroups pages so as to eliminate links to the various "top" categories. TIA! By the way, I had a good time at the NIH Wiki Fair earlier this week but as usual am taking some time to catch up with everything. But do expect to see a lot of me on the wiki soon, because a top priority is to write bunches of background, policy, and help material. You'll be very welcome to help with most of this, y'know. Really! The only things I want to insist on is that editor policy pages be left in the hands of editors, constable policy be in the hands of constables, and Ruth Ifcher and I (for now) be the only ones to make *major* edits to "Policy Outline." (Minor edits, as people have already done, are fine.) That said, there are LOTS AND LOTS of policy detail pages (e.g., on Article Mechanics), background pages (like, the page about how CZ and WP differ), and help pages to which anyone can make a contribution. --Larry _______________________________________________ Citizendium-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.purdue.edu/mailman/listinfo/citizendium-l
