Dear Werner, dear list,
this information proved very valuable.
After consulting this page
http://cadlab.cs.ucla.edu/~kohcc/sigdacdrom/instruct/fonts.html
I added 'times' to the \documentclass options, resulting in beautiful
pdf output (I give the tex code further down).
Running 'pdffonts CJKutf8-ex2gut.pdf' now yields the following:
name type emb sub uni object ID
------------------------------------ ------------ --- --- --- ---------
RPARAR+CMBX12 Type 1C yes yes yes 4 0
AdobeSongStd-Light-Identity-H CID Type 0 no no no 6 0
DNNUGE+CMR12 Type 1C yes yes yes 7 0
The code:
\documentclass[12pt,a4paper,times]{article}
\usepackage{CJKutf8}
\begin{document}
\begin{CJK}{UTF8}{song}
除了目錄的``其它''，
其它其它都 OK 。
\paragraph{在这里可以些中文马？}
mañana.
\end{CJK}
\end{document}
All the best,
Guba
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>> I installed, with the help of a friend, the AdobeSongStd-Light.otf.
>> I understand this to be unorthodox, as no Type 1 is be involved.
>> Whether that might be of importance I am not sure.
>>
>
> This is fine. On the other hand, it's a bad idea to call the Adobe
> font `gbsn' within LaTeX since this normally means the Arphic variant.
> You should rename them.
>
>
>> I noted that the PDF file (attached) my system generated is much
>> smaller than yours.
>>
>
> Yes, you are using a single OpenType font, not a bunch of Type 1
> subfonts (dvipdfmx maps the TeX subfont TFMs back to this single
> OpenType font). This gives smaller output.
>
>
>> I further attach my log file and a tree output of my ~/texmf which I
>> hope to be useful.
>>
>
> Doing `pdffonts CJKutf8-ex2gut.pdf' you can see the following output
> (`pdffonts' is part of the xpdf bundle; similar information can be
> retrieved directly within acroread, for example):
>
> name type emb sub uni object ID
> -------------------------------- ------------- --- --- --- ---------
> AdobeSongStd-Light-Identity-H CID Type 0 no no no 5 0
> [none] Type 3 yes no no 6 0
>
> As can be seen, the non-CJK font is represented as a Type 3 font!
> This effectively means that you have an embedded bitmap font which
> always looks bad if displayed on screen. For reasons unknown to me,
> dvipdfmx doesn't use the Type 1 versions of the OT1 (or T1) fonts. It
> seems that you have either misconfigured your TeX installation, or the
> appropriate CM (or EC) fonts are only available as Metafont fonts.
>
>
> Werner
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cjk maillist - [email protected]
> https://lists.ffii.org/mailman/listinfo/cjk
>
>
_______________________________________________
Cjk maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.ffii.org/mailman/listinfo/cjk
