> > Part II I disagree with (The mandatory anything could be dangerous) I wont' > even go into the mandatory testing though I still feel there should be some > level. Lets say as a compromise mandatory disclosure. At time of > registration you have to submit all testing that was done. How can making it > easier for people to see what was done and what may not have been be harmful? > And peer pressure and exposure is a wonderful thing, I am willing to bet > more people would test if they HAD to do this. > > And in this method there is no ramifications in breeding choice or > registration privelages so no decisions would be taken out of the hands of > the breeder. Nobody would be asking them to do anything more then what they > felt was best. They would just be asked to publish what they do do. > > How can this be bad? > > Dave > CastleMyst Cavaliers > http://members.aol.com/CMystCavs
Mandatory disclosure I can live with. I'm uneasy with "mandatory anything" to quote myself because of loss of freedom.It just doesn't feel right. But obviously I didn't mean anything..disclosure is fine if the club so votes. What I've found is those that preach so hard and gossip so much about "the rest of us" are usually the biggest "sinners", have the most unhealthy dogs and are just plain difficult for no apparent reason. Jo Ann ========================================================= "Magic Commands": to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL to start it up gain click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.
