On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 07:37, mehta kiran wrote:
> Hi Shailabh ,
> Will making it user configurable help?
> i:e
> if value echoed by user in reclassify file
> is :
>
> "0" : do as it happens currently.
> "-1" : reclassify all the process abiding
> the rules specified. Processes not
> following the rules should be kept
> where they are.
>From what I've read on this thread so far I don't think the semantics of
0 and -1 are different.
> "-2" : same as for "-1" but processes not
> abiding rules should be put
> in /rcfs/taskclass/members
How is this method an improvement over the method of appending a default
"catch-all" rule -- especially when weighed against the disadvantage of
bastardizing the reclassify interface?
Cheers,
-Matt
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
