Hi Mathew,
It's my mistake.
0 and -1 stand for the same thing.
So now there are only two possibilities.( 0, -2)
thanks,
kiran
--- Matthew Helsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 07:37, mehta kiran wrote:
> > Hi Shailabh ,
> > Will making it user configurable help?
> > i:e
> > if value echoed by user in reclassify
> file
> > is :
> >
> > "0" : do as it happens currently.
> > "-1" : reclassify all the process
> abiding
> > the rules specified. Processes
> not
> > following the rules should be
> kept
> > where they are.
>
> >From what I've read on this thread so far I don't
> think the semantics of
> 0 and -1 are different.
>
> > "-2" : same as for "-1" but processes
> not
> > abiding rules should be put
> > in /rcfs/taskclass/members
>
> How is this method an improvement over the method of
> appending a default
> "catch-all" rule -- especially when weighed against
> the disadvantage of
> bastardizing the reclassify interface?
>
> Cheers,
> -Matt
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
