From: "Shailabh Nagar" > > Here's a set of patches that implements rcfs using configfs. It reduces the > rcfs codebase by over 1200 lines (62%). Equally important, the new code is much easier to maintain.
Is this seen as a (the ???) future direction of the project ???. I don't subscribe to lkml, but a quick check of the archives doesn't inspire confidence that AM intends that this (configfs) be merged into the kernel core any time soon. Whilst it looks interesting, and might reduce the code-line count for this project, is it reasonable to expect potential users must incorporate a(nother) large patch-set to test the ckrm code ???. Given that this breaks the ce's, should patch sets like this even be released against the ckrm-stable tree ???. I'm more than happy to test updates like this against the development tree (f0 currently), but I have my doubts that this is a valid update against "stable" (FSVO stable). This is going to confuse the hell out of any new people coming across the project - I had the devils' own job trying to work out what patches I should be applying, and what to avoid when I joined the list. Shane ... ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
