Hi Chandra and Kurosawa-san,

Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> Hi MAEDA,
> 
> Cool... thanks, i 'll have a look and try it out.
> 
> One generic comment, it will be better if you could separate the CKRM
> functionality (most of your patch) to a separate file and place it in
> the ckrm directory rather than adding to the cpr_rc.c file in the kernel
> directory.

It requires some changes of Kurosawa-san's code structure to do so.
I've never tried it, but at least struct cpu_rc_domain, struct cpu_rc
and some static inline functions must be moved to cpu_rc.h.

Kurosawa-san, how do you think these changes against your code?
Obviously this change may also affects your cpumeter interface code.

> chandra
> On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 17:37 +0900, MAEDA Naoaki wrote:
> 
>>Hello Kurosawa-san and Chandra,
>>
>>I finished to connect kurosawa-san's cpu resource controller
>>with f0.2 ckrm. This patch is against 2.6.13+ckrm-f0.2 with the
>>CPU resource controller patch has been posted to LKML by Kurosawa-san.
>>
>>I attached the CPU resource controller patch for convenience, and
>>I also attached a temporary ckrm bug fix patch to correct some problems 
>>I've reported to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>Notice that removing class is not tested yet, because the res_free
>>callback is not called even if a class is removed. I doubt it is 
>>another bug of f series ckrm core.
> 
> 
> The patch I posted on Sep 30th with the subject
> 
> 
> "[PATCH]: f0.2 do not kref_get in
> ckrm_alloc_class"
> 
> should take care of this problem

Oh! I've missed the mail. The problem has gone after applying the patch.

p.s.
Sorry for the subject line contains mis-spelling - grue should be glue.
The pronunciation of 'l' and 'r' is interchangeable for me :-P

Thanks,
MAEDA Naoaki



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech

Reply via email to