On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:41:09 +0200 Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 16:26 +0900, MAEDA Naoaki wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 08:59:49 +0200 > > Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You simply cannot ignore interactive tasks. At the very least, you have > > > to disallow requeue if the resource limit has been exceeded, otherwise, > > > this patch set is non-functional. > > > > It can be easily implemented on top of the current code. Do you know a good > > sample program that is judged as interactive but consumes lots of cpu? > > X sometimes, Mozilla sometimes,... KDE konsole when scrolling,... > anything that on average sleeps more than roughly 5% of it's slice can > starve you to death either alone, or (worse) with peers. They are true interactive tasks, aren't they? Oh! I should say "that is not interactive, but judged as interactive and consumes lots of cpu". Thanks, MAEDA Naoaki ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
