Hi, > On Friday 28 April 2006 22:07, MAEDA Naoaki wrote: > > Con Kolivas wrote: > > > I agree with Mike here. It's either global resource management or it > > > isn't. If one user is using all interactive tasks and the other user none > > > it's unfair resource management. > > > > My intention was not to hurt interactive task's response, but it seems > > that just ignoring interactive tasks is not good. I'll consider > > regulating interactive tasks also. > > I appreciate the gesture of concern over interactive tasks :-) Unfortunately > it doesn't change the fact that interactive tasks can also consume large > proportions of the resources, and that any interactivity estimator will get > it wrong on occasion and flag a non interactive task as interactive.
I think you can introduce some threshold to estimate whether a process should be treated as an interactive process or not while vanilla kernel defines it statically. It will make processes in a resource group consuming large cpu-time hard to be treated as interactive processes. Thanks, Hirokazu Takahashi. ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
