On Friday 28 April 2006 19:29, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 16:56 +0900, MAEDA Naoaki wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:41:09 +0200 > > > > Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 16:26 +0900, MAEDA Naoaki wrote: > > > > On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 08:59:49 +0200 > > > > > > > > Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > You simply cannot ignore interactive tasks. At the very least, you > > > > > have to disallow requeue if the resource limit has been exceeded, > > > > > otherwise, this patch set is non-functional. > > > > > > > > It can be easily implemented on top of the current code. Do you know > > > > a good sample program that is judged as interactive but consumes lots > > > > of cpu? > > > > > > X sometimes, Mozilla sometimes,... KDE konsole when scrolling,... > > > anything that on average sleeps more than roughly 5% of it's slice can > > > starve you to death either alone, or (worse) with peers. > > > > They are true interactive tasks, aren't they? > > Oh! I should say "that is not interactive, but judged as interactive > > and consumes lots of cpu". > > Why do you care? There is only one thing that matters, and that is the > fact that cpu can be used and remain utterly uncontrolled. This renders > your system non-functional for resource management. Period. All stop.
I agree with Mike here. It's either global resource management or it isn't. If one user is using all interactive tasks and the other user none it's unfair resource management. -- -ck ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
