On Friday 28 April 2006 17:46, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 09:11 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 09:56 +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote: > > > I'm also pretty sure, that CPU controller based on timeslice tricks > > > behaves poorly on burstable load patterns as well and with interactive > > > tasks. So before commiting I propose to perform a good testing on > > > different load patterns. > > > > Yes, it can only react very slowly. > > Actually, this might not be that much of a problem. I know I can > traverse queue heads periodically very cheaply. Traversing both active > and expired arrays to requeue starving tasks once every 100ms costs max > 4usecs (3GHz P4) for a typical distribution.
How many tasks? Your function was O(n) so the more tasks the longer that max value was. -- -ck ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
