Hi Maeda, thank you for the information.
we here at Bull have been working on the memory controller for some monthes for its various versions. We are aware of Andrew's concerns about it and we are in touch with Chandra to try find a design that could fit a less intrusive approach, with an easier maintenance. We will discuss here to define an implementation that can be accepted in mainline and that gives the required memory regulation fonctionnalities. jean-pierre MAEDA Naoaki wrote: >Hi all, > >Recently, Andrew Moron came Japan to address the status and direction >of kernel development on OSDL-Japan Linux Symposium. His presentation >material is available at the following URL. > >http://www.osdl.jp/docs/Seminar0613/AndrewMorton_Status_and_Direction_of_Kernel_Development.pdf > ># Don't worry, written in English :-) > >He said that the current CKRM core is well-implemented and is acceptable >for a merge, and CPU controller needs work, but will be OK. > >However, he also said that unless the design of CKRM memory controller >is sorted out, CKRM is blocked. > >Thanks, >MAEDA Naoaki > > > >_______________________________________________ >ckrm-tech mailing list >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech > > > -- Jean-Pierre DION Linux and Gnome projects manager Bull, Architect of an Open World TM Tel : +33 (0)4 76 29 72 34 http://www.bull.com http://www.bullopensource.org http://gnome.bullfreeware.com/new_index.html _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
