On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 00:20 -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The fixed-sized buffer used by show_members() means that currently if
> you have a fairly large number of processes in a class (~1000) then
> attempts to read the "members" file for that class fail with ENOSPC.
> What's the plan for getting round that problem?
> 
> The cleanest approach that I can think of would be to extend configfs,
> to allow configfs entries to (optionally) report values via a seq_file
> interface rather a fixed-sized buffer.

This is the plan. But, the configfs maintainer was not happy with that
feature addition as it will make the file system more complex.

> 
> Paul
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> ckrm-tech mailing list
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
-- 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Chandra Seetharaman               | Be careful what you choose....
              - [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |      .......you may get it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech

Reply via email to