On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 13:05 -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> On 8/4/06, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > In a contest between "complex" and "having some pathetic limitation", we'll
> > take "complex".
>
> The third option would be "use something other than configfs". But
> that would probably rewriting something like the old rcfs that was
> almost configfs but not quite.
We got rid of rcfs and started to use configfs mainly to avoid
unnecessary bloat due to ckrm/RG and use the features available in-tree
effectively.
>
> Paul
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose....
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | .......you may get it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
