On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 15:01 -0700, Paul Menage wrote: > So is there an argument against moving to reporting things like > membership (and maybe arbitrary stats) via sysfs rather than configfs?
Is there a reason to do it, other than keeping configfs simple? Seems fine to me, otherwise. Frankly, if we're talking about _process_ grouping, does it make some sense to put these things in /proc? -- Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
