On 9/20/06, Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think we should have one container mechanism instead of multiple. Maybe > merge the two? The cpuset functionality is well established and working > right.
The basic container abstraction provided by cpusets is very nice - maybe rename it from "cpuset" to "container"? Since it already provides access to memory nodes as well as cpus, and could be extended to handle other resource types too (network, disk). Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
