On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Rohit Seth wrote: > > How does the containers implementation under discussion behave if a > > process is part of a container and the container is removed? > It first removes all the tasks belonging to this container (which means > resetting the container pointers in task_struct and then per page > container pointer belonging to anonymous pages). It then clears the > container pointers in the mapping structure and also in the pages > belonging to these files.
So the application continues to run unharmed? Could we equip containers with restrictions on processors and nodes for NUMA? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech